Site Meter
Fritz Feds

Front page
Archive
XML Site Feed

Federalist Society members corresponding from the Walter F. Mondale Hall at the University of Minnesota.

This is not an official website of the Federalist Society.

The opinions expressed on this blog are solely those of each individual author and are not approved, endorsed, or denied by the National or University of Minnesota Federalist Society.


Comments? Send them here


Minnesota Weblogs
Captain's Quarters
Fraters Libertas
Lileks
Jay Reding
SCSU Scholars
Power Line
Generic Heretic
Joint Strike Weasel
Jurisdynamics
The Foundation Dub Joint

Other Recommended Blogs
The Buck Stops Here
The Corner on NRO
How Appealing
Instapundit
Professor Bainbridge
Southern Appeal
The Volokh Conspiracy
The New Constitutionalist
Crescat Sententia

Fed-Soc Blogs
Ex Parte - Harvard Fed Soc
Georgetown Federalists
Ex Post
Yale Federalists

Of Interest
First Things
Intercollegiate Studies Institute
Young America’s Foundation
Leadership Institute
F.I.R.E.
Heritage Foundation
Claremont Institute
Hoover Institution
Cato Institute
Hillsdale College-Imprimis

[Powered by Blogger]

Tuesday, April 18, 2006

Posted 8:16 PM by Jason
Wait wait wait...

So Fair v. Rumsfeld wasn't about the law schools' free speech?  Turns out that not only did the Supreme Court not buy their argument, neither did they.  In a speech to Lambda at Harvard, BC Law Prof. Kent Greenfield, who founded and led the group, made that much pretty clear.  Straight from the glowing Crimson article:

"He admitted that the case “wasn’t really about free speech,” as FAIR had asserted in its challenge, but “about equality.” FAIR, he said, had come up with a “creative” argument to fight Solomon."



0 comments
Comments: Post a Comment

Home