Front page
Archive
XML Site Feed
Federalist Society members corresponding from the Walter F. Mondale Hall at the University of Minnesota.
This is not an official website of the Federalist Society.
The opinions expressed on this blog are solely those of each individual author and are not approved, endorsed, or denied by the National or University of Minnesota Federalist Society.
Comments? Send them here
Minnesota Weblogs
Captain's Quarters
Fraters Libertas
Lileks
Jay Reding
SCSU Scholars
Power Line
Generic Heretic
Joint Strike Weasel
Jurisdynamics
The Foundation Dub Joint
Other Recommended Blogs
The Buck Stops Here
The Corner on NRO
How Appealing
Instapundit
Professor Bainbridge
Southern Appeal
The Volokh Conspiracy
The New Constitutionalist
Crescat Sententia
Fed-Soc Blogs
Ex Parte - Harvard Fed Soc
Georgetown Federalists
Ex Post
Yale Federalists
Of Interest
First Things
Intercollegiate Studies Institute
Young America’s Foundation
Leadership Institute
F.I.R.E.
Heritage Foundation
Claremont Institute
Hoover Institution
Cato Institute
Hillsdale College-Imprimis
![[Powered by Blogger]](http://buttons.blogger.com/bloggerbutton1.gif){kind=small}
Posted
10:06 PM
by Jason
Presidential Debates and the Line Item Veto
A sample:
"The U.S. Constitution lays out a very specific process by which laws are to be made in this country. They must be passed by the two houses of Congress and presented to the president for him to sign or veto. For 200 years everyone has understood that the president must either sign or veto the laws presented to him — he cannot accept them in part and reject them in part. The language of the Constitution is very clear on this point, and it is different from the language in many State constitutions which explicitly give their governors a line-item-veto power."
0 comments